I've deleted our posts here and on X regarding new MHRA requirements, after a lot of discussion behind the scenes today.
We've had conflicting reports in from companies, from vague claims some information is inaccurate (unspecified), to concern privileged information was shared within the CIC which should not have been. MedBud was abiding by CIC rules for working groups when covering the information provided, and accurately reflected what was relayed. We understand there may have been changes today within the CIC as a result.
The CIC has a duty to ensure that supposed official guidance that goes out via working groups is accurate, we await further public clarification of new requirements by the MHRA - with correction on any prior information provided which was not fully accurate.
MedBud has a duty to accurately report changes which could affect availability for patients, and attempted to do so based on information provided.
We've had conflicting reports in from companies, from vague claims some information is inaccurate (unspecified), to concern privileged information was shared within the CIC which should not have been. MedBud was abiding by CIC rules for working groups when covering the information provided, and accurately reflected what was relayed. We understand there may have been changes today within the CIC as a result.
The CIC has a duty to ensure that supposed official guidance that goes out via working groups is accurate, we await further public clarification of new requirements by the MHRA - with correction on any prior information provided which was not fully accurate.
MedBud has a duty to accurately report changes which could affect availability for patients, and attempted to do so based on information provided.