• A friendly and supportive community, register today. Our forums use a separate account system.

UK Vaping found to be 'more dangerous than smoking' as bombshell report identifies raised risk of 3 deadly diseases

A groundbreaking study from Manchester Metropolitan University has revealed that vaping could pose greater health risks than smoking, with users facing increased dangers of dementia, heart disease and organ failure.

The first-of-its-kind research, released today, found that e-cigarettes may be more hazardous than traditional cigarettes due to their continuous usage pattern and high nicotine content.

The research found that vapers and smokers showed similar patterns of blood vessel damage and impaired blood flow.

"What we have found is the dangers for someone who keeps vaping are no different from smokers," said Dr Maxime Boidin, the study's lead researcher.

Vaping

Dr Boidin explained that vaping poses unique risks as users can consume nicotine more continuously, noting: "With vapes, you just keep going and it's much harder to know how many puffs you've had."

In the study, researchers monitored volunteers with an average age of 27, all with similar fitness levels.

Participants underwent stress tests to measure blood vessel elasticity and brain blood flow, having abstained from vaping, smoking and exercising for 12 hours beforehand.

The mediated dilation test, using an arm cuff to measure artery expansion, revealed both smokers and vapers had damaged artery walls that could no longer dilate - indicating serious future cardiovascular risks.

MORE LIKE THIS:


Manchester Metropolitan University

Further tests demonstrated that blood flow impairment was similar in both smokers and vapers, increasing their risk of cognitive dysfunction and dementia.

"When you put this mixture of metals and chemicals into your body you can't expect nothing to happen," Dr Boidin warned.

"The only benefit of vaping is to help people quit smoking, but if they keep vaping the result is going to be the same."

The findings come as vaping rates in Britain reach unprecedented levels, with approximately one in ten adults now using e-cigarettes.

Man smoking disposable vape


Smoking

Surveys have revealed that around 8 per cent of adult vapers have never smoked before taking up the habit.

While e-cigarettes have generally been considered safer than traditional cigarettes and useful for smoking cessation, experts are increasingly concerned about their high nicotine content raising heart rate and blood pressure.

The Government has announced that disposable vapes will be banned from June.

However, Dr Marina Murphy, scientific spokesperson for the UK Vaping Industry Association, defended vaping's safety record: "Millions of people have been using vaping products safely for many years."

"All the available data suggests that vapes are unlikely to exceed 5 per cent of the health risks associated with cigarettes," she added.

Continue reading...
 
I knew this would be the case, it's why I never left the roll up's for a baccy vape.
 
Firstly, after a cursory search I can't find this study anywhere. I can find plenty of low quality news sources reporting on it, but I can't find the study itself. None of the articles link to it or mention where it was published. That's suspicious.

Secondly, there source of the study is hardly high quality. MMU is, I imagine, a polytechnic university, not a leading Russell Group research institution or anything like that. And for some reason it comes from their Sports Science department... and the lead researcher has literally never published anything on vaping or smoking before, his specialty seems to be exercise regimes for people with cardiovascular disease. That's also suspicious.

Thirdly, the study as described sounds entirely correlational. They've taken some metrics from smokers and vapers, done some basic blood flow measurements, and found similar results in both groups? No description of how they controlled for the fact most vapers are ex-smokers, no mention of the inclusion of a non-vaping non-smoking control group.

They haven't even hypothesised what aspect of the vaping might be responsible - is it the nicotine? Is it the oils? Is it the act of inhaling a slightly higher temperature gas what's doing it? Does it matter what dose you use, is there a daily limit to keep risk tolerable? How big IS the risk, exactly? What are the %s? Do 0.001% of vapers end up with dementia more than the control, or is it 10%? They mentioned in the article about heavy metals and other chemicals - that would indicate fake/counterfeit vape juices. Did they control for people who buy regulated products vs those who purchase the cheap rubbish in any high street shop?

Finally, vaping nicotine liquids has only been a big thing for about a decade. How could they POSSIBLY have reliable information on dementia risk from such a short period of time? Anyone likely to have developed dementia in the past 10 years is likely to be very old, and only have vaped for 10 out of their 60-80 years. Anyone likely to have been vaping for an entire decade is probably in their late 20s or early 30s, nowhere near developing dementia. I think they're deducing all that from the reduced blood flow in their basic tests, but there's no actual data that suggests vapers actually end up with dementia or any other disease at higher rates than others.
 

Just Like That 9/11 Anthrax, COVID Came From Fort Detrick​


In summer 2019, I experimented with a new way of getting extremely high on marijuana: instead of smoking it, I sucked vaporized goo out of a “pen”. Not sure why, but that vapor hit my lungs very differently than the smoke, causing uncontrollable coughing that threatened to fracture my ribs. So when the news suddenly came out about EVALI (E-cigarette or Vaping Associated Lung Injury) causing young people to develop pneumonia and die on ventilators in hospitals, I believed it. I put down the pen because I did not want to drown in my own lung fluids. A year later, as COVID gripped the world, I read a comment on ZeroHedge that EVALI was really COVID. And it clicked. My weed vape, for all its drawbacks, was not going to put me in the ICU. Rather, COVID had broken out several months earlier than admitted.

The circumstantial evidence is overwhelming. For one, EVALI and COVID symptoms are identical, both akin to a severe case of influenza. Furthermore, EVALI could not be tested for or positively diagnosed in any way. It could only be diagnosed by ruling out all alternative diseases - of which COVID was not yet an admitted possibility. As its name betrays, EVALI is a diagnosis of association. Thus anyone who had an unexplained case of severe pneumonia and a history of vaporizer use became an EVALI patient. In an incredible display of timing, EVALI cases peaked in September 2019 and disappeared by February 2020, just in time for COVID’s official debut in the United States. The CDC blamed tainted black market weed products for some EVALI cases but admitted others were associated with legal nicotine products. In fact, the CDC never claimed to know what caused EVALI, or how. They swept it under the rug.

More: https://kalkallim.substack.com/p/just-like-that-911-anthrax-covid
 
Back
Top