I hope so. We basically love them, except this little dirty bit they got going on... cb1 your very good at what you do - no need for penny pinching for you, why am I even discussing this when you guys are professionals in every way except this dirty stuff? That fair?
store.montu.uk
It'll just encourage people to seek out the places charging the correct prices and pharmacies will learn the hard way!
Couldn't say without ringing them but Newgrove are the main pharmacy on this one and will reflect the price drop instantly I'd of thought .
Our script isn't getting there till Wednesday or Thursday so we've got to be doubtful of getting this now .
CB1 documented behaviour around pricing I find kind of a next level greed - imagine an alledged professional, sometimes, reportedly, at owner level, arguing (lol) with a patient (with an average spend of £5000+) about what £60 to them? Are they serious? The owners should be ashamed of this culture - even if its not them its a very bad idea / pr and ultimately brings into question their governance.Our script isn't getting there till Wednesday or Thursday so we've got to be doubtful of getting this now .
In answer to the question it's widely available at £85 and now Montu aren't taking any more requests it's sort of blunted the bargaining tool in a way but the way CB1 Medical asked how cheap it was at Montu I got the impression there was wriggle room down from it's elevated price to the more usual price of £85 but when I mentioned it was £65 at Montu that was the end of that and I'd suggest you ask them as you can only gain .
I think I'm no longer recommending them until they start acting professionally with decency. Its terrible behaving like this, esp with vulnerable patients. OK I decided - for now I'm no longer recommending them. Plenty of others, some are cheaper and behaving appropriately.
Great points and your spot on to keep repeating it until they act.
Regards this we'll see what we can find out and it looks the same as the Curaleaf GG#4 problem that is listed by the manufacturer as Indica Hybrid but is widely accepted as a Sativa Hybrid and even prescribed with Sat Hybrid in mind .
So I wasn't going to bring up NLD and BLD, chemo or genotypical expression as I think UKMC is still struggling to come to terms with the original terminology from centuries ago. A lot of this also becomes moot when they have set times they can allow plants to flower as CBN production is not then what it should be.
.......
's
I agree with ye but i think It needs to be brought up imho and it isnt complicated it just puts a magnifying glass over the craziness of Indica vs Sativa as it doesnt and cant really exist outside of genotype with all polyhybrids now.So I wasn't going to bring up NLD and BLD, chemo or genotypical expression as I think UKMC is still struggling to come to terms with the original terminology from centuries ago. A lot of this also becomes moot when they have set times they can allow plants to flower as CBN production is not then what it should be.
The current polyhybrids are deficient in various cannibinoids which while not proven are believen to have at minimum entourage effect, potentially they modify our cannibinoid receptors the same way CBD and THC do.
Plants have limited energy, in striving for the highest THC numbers they are foregoing other imho vital elements. malana cream is world renowned hash, when the landrace team tested the local plants, all of which are used in making the hash, they found three 'types'
BD/BD - High CBD low/no THC
BT/BT. - High THC low/no CBD
BD/BT. - Balanced CBD/THC
(taken from the following article https://indianlandraceexchange.com/portfolios/northwestern-himalayas/)
to be honest most of this polyhybrid shit is just generic, no taste, no terpenes, but it looks good on Insta and an army of hype merchants have ensured based on images alone it's the fire
Because no one in the industry is going to flower a 16-22 weaker when they can flower a 50-63 day Hybrid and the selection process would cost a fortune.
