- MedBud ID
- MB-6935
Last edited:
T34 master kush!?!?!
Something has got to have happened with the parameters of testing as T34 is the small buds ,I'll be levitating off the smallsT34 master kush!?!?!![]()
![]()
Mate same LMAO and if that's the smalls what are the bigs clocking in at??Something has got to have happened with the parameters of testing as T34 is the small buds ,I'll be levitating off the smalls![]()
Yep it's getting silly or a new reality %wise but it'll be fascinating to see as the strain done well is a winner I feel and although I didn't try the Lit products last time personally they were well received and a bit cheaper.Mate same LMAO and if that's the smalls what are the bigs clocking in at??![]()
Totally agree mate it’s a beauty of a strain fingers crossed it deliversYep it's getting silly or a new reality %wise but it'll be fascinating to see as the strain done well is a winner I feel and although I didn't try the Lit products last time personally they were well received and a bit cheaper.
I would have hoped here being so supposedly tightly regulated the labs have to be signed off as trustworthy and legit but it does make you wonderThis would be laughable if it wasnt medicinal, Why recently have we seen all these extremely high THC numbers esp from strains that was under 25 suddenly over 30 same producer , They call it lab shopping but is it xeal or whose testing , THC testing by temu lol . Master kush pushes 24% , Lit master kush non smalls germany 29%.
https://flowzz.com/product/lit-29-1-mku-master-kush
I would hope but the over 30% strains that were retested in us i dont think any was actually over 30 so to see it here esp 36% i really cant see it , playing the same game as n america imoI would have hoped here being so supposedly tightly regulated the labs have to be signed off as trustworthy and legit but it does make you wonder![]()
Hate to say it as it’s a sorry state of affairs but I think you’re probably right. There have been a few lately where I have thought how the hell have they got that cultivar to that high a THC content. I had been putting it down to improving lighting tech and pheno hunting but realistically that is probably willful ignorance and they are fudging the numbersI would hope but the over 30% strains that were retested in us i dont think any was actually over 30 so to see it here esp 36% i really cant see it , playing the same game as n america imo
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37043421/
Keif weed , sample spiking
https://www.homegrown-group.com/blog/labshopping
This is just my own opinion but it has been rife in the industry , canada not looked into to be honest and not as rife as us , But highest sample tested was 23 % which seems fair, Donkey butter went from 27% to 36% and is 1 of the highest testing ave seen ever. So the uk med market have done something very special, All of a sudden big THC numbers competing globally. Rob clarke touched on a tax on THC % lol watch what happens if so. It seems dodgy to me .Hate to say it as it’s a sorry state of affairs but I think you’re probably right. There have been a few lately where I have thought how the hell have they got that cultivar to that high a THC content. I had been putting it down to improving lighting tech and pheno hunting but realistically that is probably willful ignorance and they are fudging the numbersgreat resources bro thanks for sharing
![]()
There’s a guy makes you tube vids called drew with green hair he’s got a testing machine and he can have a bud but depending on where he takes the bit to test can be dramatically different if thr top of the bud or middle vs the sides he did used to show the difference every now and then but hadn’t for while so not sure if the makers didn’t want him showing that but its the same with these iv definitely had stronger buds than others and I’m sure of that xHate to say it as it’s a sorry state of affairs but I think you’re probably right. There have been a few lately where I have thought how the hell have they got that cultivar to that high a THC content. I had been putting it down to improving lighting tech and pheno hunting but realistically that is probably willful ignorance and they are fudging the numbersgreat resources bro thanks for sharing
![]()
No I think you’re right on the money! Almost every day we see the same strain re released with higher claimed THC now and its not like there has been some radical change in lighting technology or genetics that would explain it.This is just my own opinion but it has been rife in the industry , canada not looked into to be honest and not as rife as us , But highest sample tested was 23 % which seems fair, Donkey butter went from 27% to 36% and is 1 of the highest testing ave seen ever. So the uk med market have done something very special, All of a sudden big THC numbers competing globally. Rob clarke touched on a tax on THC % lol watch what happens if so. It seems dodgy to me .
Not a slight on lit farms to be honest cos they can grow gd weed more so industry and testing machines.
Oh dude I know who you mean his vids are mint hopefully he does one on some of the new super high THC claimed strainsThere’s a guy makes you tube vids called drew with green hair he’s got a testing machine and he can have a bud but depending on where he takes the bit to test can be dramatically different if thr top of the bud or middle vs the sides he did used to show the difference every now and then but hadn’t for while so not sure if the makers didn’t want him showing that but its the same with these iv definitely had stronger buds than others and I’m sure of that x
I watched Drew do one on concentrates recently and it was claimed to about 67% and tested about 66.5% iirc so it seemed to be accurate in that case but on flower I think the purple pro only goes up to 30% so with the way things are supposedly going THC wise then where will it leave the purple pro.Oh dude I know who you mean his vids are mint hopefully he does one on some of the new super high THC claimed strains![]()
I thought he could test the donkey butter and that kind of thing on the concentrate mode but maybe that is just wishful thinkingI watched Drew do one on concentrates recently and it was claimed to about 67% and tested about 66.5% iirc so it seemed to be accurate in that case but on flower I think the purple pro only goes up to 30% so with the way things are supposedly going THC wise then where will it leave the purple pro.
I'm sure Smacksalad's got one too
Yes your right the purple pro does only go upto 30 I was wondering why he wasn’t testing any of his medical flowers eeek yeah that costs like 1200 or something silly so there going to have to improve it or be out of business xI watched Drew do one on concentrates recently and it was claimed to about 67% and tested about 66.5% iirc so it seemed to be accurate in that case but on flower I think the purple pro only goes up to 30% so with the way things are supposedly going THC wise then where will it leave the purple pro.
I'm sure Smacksalad's got one too
How come big nasty and others can sell weed under there names yet was looking at that new company the headstone that popped up and it said they were actually jungle boys strains but like there selling to medical under a different name but maybe coz they don’t want people to know don’t need to pay like 50-80 for a Henry as in a jungle boys bag would cost stupid money but few new ones popped up yet no sales yet… xI watched Drew do one on concentrates recently and it was claimed to about 67% and tested about 66.5% iirc so it seemed to be accurate in that case but on flower I think the purple pro only goes up to 30% so with the way things are supposedly going THC wise then where will it leave the purple pro.
I'm sure Smacksalad's got one too
Js Medi lounge | Master Kush (LIT) Review| Better Smoked Than Vaped? | Under £70 for 10g
Please like and subscribe, help support patient videos on YouTube.