The issue here is regulatory compliance, it's a bit hard for me to try interpret/summarise all the laws/regs/guidance available - but in short, there's previously been many controversies about particular public interactions between industry and patients. It's to the point, I know many intentional cultivators have been strongly cautioned not to engage with UK patients whatsoever by Instagram/email etc. For example, even previous MCPA live Zoom discussions I helped arrange and host were being called into question because of mentioning cultivar names (which was being misrepresented as promotional just taking patient questions.)we prob going to get industry reps here either covert or maybe better, unless their a patient, industry peeps could have a badge or something maybe? Just thoughts as things are def getting busier here (fantastic!) and all the development (for the reviews + everything also fantastic!).
What do you think?
On the flip side, I hear all the justification for why things should be compliant too. Some companies have quietly stated their interest in interacting with patients directly here - the big consideration is that MedBud needs to practice a high degree of caution not to facilitate any actions which could in some way break the law overall.
If it's possible, we'll get it done - we just also need to be able to provide companies confidence that it would be fully compliant by actually seeking better guidance/advice ourselves first, and figuring out what limitations there would be overall. We'd literally need a stringent rule book for how companies conduct themselves here if viable.