BudGuy
Filling Out
- Messages
- 323
- Likes/Reactions
- 713
- Clinic
- 🏴 Mamedica®
So I was looking at the cheapest bud on the listings, and it's Black Cherry Punch at £4.95. Then I realised it's only 15% strength, and I thought well if you tally it up by mg of THC then although it's the cheapest bud in absolute terms, it's actually more of a £9/g strain if you were to strengthen it up to match some of the higher strength stuff - then in fact it would be one of the most expensive strains on the market.
But then I've been thinking about how much THC strength actually matters. This is my first month trying cannabis strains at the higher end of the strength scale, with Farm Gas and Chemnesia Haze at 27%, after starting my medical journey around the 20-23% mark, and I have to say I'm not noticing the massive upswing in strength that I had led myself to expect.
My tolerance is probably higher than it's ever been at this point, but I still thought I'd notice something semi-significant. So I'm starting to get the impression that perhaps THC % means less than say, alcohol % does, where it's quite predictable and consistent in terms of effects per drinks between say a beer and a vodka.
So I just wanted to get everyone else's experience on what difference THC % really makes.
Do you notice a significant difference/correlation between the printed THC % and the intensity of effects?
Have you had 15-19% strains which hit you really hard? Have you had 27-31% strains that done nothing?
Is it the case that if you're lucky, the £4.95 15% strains might just have the right terpenes for the entourage effect to make that strain feel like a 30%er to you, even though it's objectively much weaker?
What about balanced 7% strains? Anyone who regularly consumes the 25%+ stuff who has consumed the balanced strains and still gotten effect from them?
Since Sativa/Indica, Nighttime/Daytime, and high strength vs low strength seem to be unreliable markers of effects for me so far, is it best just to spend some time at the cheaper/lower strength side of the market and see if there just happens to be some heavy hitters there for me personally, despite an apparent lack of THC?
But then I've been thinking about how much THC strength actually matters. This is my first month trying cannabis strains at the higher end of the strength scale, with Farm Gas and Chemnesia Haze at 27%, after starting my medical journey around the 20-23% mark, and I have to say I'm not noticing the massive upswing in strength that I had led myself to expect.
My tolerance is probably higher than it's ever been at this point, but I still thought I'd notice something semi-significant. So I'm starting to get the impression that perhaps THC % means less than say, alcohol % does, where it's quite predictable and consistent in terms of effects per drinks between say a beer and a vodka.
So I just wanted to get everyone else's experience on what difference THC % really makes.
Do you notice a significant difference/correlation between the printed THC % and the intensity of effects?
Have you had 15-19% strains which hit you really hard? Have you had 27-31% strains that done nothing?
Is it the case that if you're lucky, the £4.95 15% strains might just have the right terpenes for the entourage effect to make that strain feel like a 30%er to you, even though it's objectively much weaker?
What about balanced 7% strains? Anyone who regularly consumes the 25%+ stuff who has consumed the balanced strains and still gotten effect from them?
Since Sativa/Indica, Nighttime/Daytime, and high strength vs low strength seem to be unreliable markers of effects for me so far, is it best just to spend some time at the cheaper/lower strength side of the market and see if there just happens to be some heavy hitters there for me personally, despite an apparent lack of THC?