- Messages
- 1,573
- Likes/Reactions
- 3,868
- Clinic
- 🏴 Medicann
Thanks mate! Yes I was quite surprised and relieved for it to get resolved to be honest. And it's not a great choice is it! But I'm not sure if I can stay with Medicann after how they have treated me to be honest. The grass isn't always greener though so I will have to see what a few clinics are saying this week if I get a chance.Pleased for you! It's a result, which is better than no result.
I'd hang on in there, there is less review, unannounced annual reviews by a Dr very nice person but knew less than a mouse, monthly battles for scripts and deliveries, lost emails and complaints... than Alternaleaf!
Big hug.
New post automatically merged:
Shocking isn't it? Yes I am sure trading standards would be impressed, as mould is a clear quality issue and a refund/replacement should be sorted in a reasonable timeframe, with 'reasonable' almost never exceeding 28 days, and also GMC with regards to restricting access. They have sole duty of care so to do that is totally bonkers. Thanks mate appreciate itIt has been an eyeopener to read your experiences and that something like this isnt standardised to begin with.
I am no legal expert at a returns process however it should be far more clearly defined.
No one expects returns due to "buyers remorse" but this is clearly not that.
Trading standards would be all over issues regarding defective/faulty product.
The added restriction of access to medication even if it was just bureaucratic is not what you want to see.
Hope you can put it all behind you and rooting for you chief![]()
Last edited:
