Now I can see what your angle is ,you think I don't want 3.5g wake up bro, no ulterior motive here .its like catchphrase say what you see and that's what i did, anything else I would of been compromising myself by not speaking up and raising awareness ,I can only speak to what I found ,but have total confidence in my friend from the forum's claims as .well the other claims you can do what you want with but rest assured it has fuck all to do with 3.5fukingrams.
Well the first report was utter bs. The second report is practically identical to the first. Looks like from same batch of photos as well. Then there is you who can't post a photo of the bud with the tub. All adds up good.
Right lets start again because I thought you was calling me or my forum friend a headcase an got my back up understandably i'll try and do what I can now but my lighting is shite .give me a min.
It's not true. So the three people with alleged bugs just happen to have a £300 microscope or a wicked iPhone or a web cam from 1980. The buds don't match. The trichomes are not like that on medical. The colour of the bud doesn't match. Posted by a known headcase. Better check your bed for bedbugs then everyone. The mafia don't like 3.5s. I know we all stoners but wake up and smell the coffee. I'm calling bs.
One is a trusted forum member here, I can't speak for the other two. I don't understand the claims that the buds "don't match" or 'the trichomes are not like that on medical". Calling other forum members a 'headcase' for trying to report honestly and earnestly isn't fair, and has resulted in a ban.
You're 100% right that the vast majority of the industry don't like 3.5gs being available, and are actively trying to avoid it - but I don't doubt what appears to be an honest account from our single most active forum member here.
At least one of the above claims has gone through official channels, and I can confirm was bought to the producer's attention, and is being considered valid. Expect further information in the coming days.
One is a trusted forum member here, I can't speak for the other two. I don't understand the claims that the buds "don't match" or 'the trichomes are not like that on medical". Calling other forum members a 'headcase' for trying to report honestly and earnestly isn't fair, and has resulted in a ban.
You're 100% right that the vast majority of the industry don't like 3.5gs being available, and are actively trying to avoid it - but I don't doubt what appears to be an honest account from our single most active forum member here.
At least one of the above claims has gone through official channels, and I can confirm was bought to the producer's attention, and is being considered valid. Expect further information in the coming days.
Well the first report was utter bs. The second report is practically identical to the first. Looks like from same batch of photos as well. Then there is you who can't post a photo of the bud with the tub. All adds up good.
Evening @Lampylad, yes it a downer for sure but nonetheless welcome to the forum .
Contacting Mamedica® first thing in the morning to see where I go from here and if they send it to the producer or whatever,
Evening @Lampylad, yes it a downer for sure but nonetheless welcome to the forum .
Contacting Mamedica® first thing in the morning to see where I go from here and if they send it to the producer or whatever,
Well the first report was utter bs. The second report is practically identical to the first. Looks like from same batch of photos as well. Then there is you who can't post a photo of the bud with the tub. All adds up good.
You can spread the lies as much as you want. It was reported to Mamedica® before I even made that initial reddit post. Not sure if you even looked at my reddit account but it's very clear I'm a legit patient & not some "headcase" who doesn't have a prescription like a few people seem to be spreading.
Beyond all the reports here, we also were provided with another report from a popular YouTuber – we don't doubt the issue exists. I hear that Xeal Pharma have gone through 4 different retention samples (40g) and inspected under the microscope with no issues found whatsoever.
I feel that makes sense statistically, we've seen 5 reports across several thousand pots distributed. The odds of them finding issue within 40g would be quite low based on the volume of complaints we've seen overall. Moreover, if the issue was noticeable with the retention samples, it would have been caught earlier overall when they were first packaged and stored.
There are predatory insects used in the cultivator's facility, there's absolutely no reason to doubt reports. Infact, we've had feedback from two different Canadians now, one an ex-employee at Qwest, another working in the Canadian industry; explaining through how they previously had issues in the facility, and several staff went on training courses on pest management via beneficial insects.
Speaking from a regulatory perspective, there's actually a 2% overall limit for foreign matter - meaning 0.2g of 10g could be insects and it would still pass compliance. It's not what patients want, but at least there's a somewhat reasonable reason for how this managed to occur.
We're still wearing a public warning on the main database, though a new batch has since landed and all previous batch pots have now been distributed.
What we're most interested in seeing now is if anyone else receives bugs under the new batch number(s).
I havent checked mine yet what i hate is it breaks the seal you can for sure smell leakage so its kinda dictating to me open me now before xmas otherwise if there are bugs you will be down 20g argh. As soon as Mamedica® get around to replacing the broken seal wedding cake ill go through it all and it will go into jars but i will visually inspect it. 0.2g insect may be ok from regulations point but its a brand killer. Goodluck selling it if it had 0.2g insects.
Beyond all the reports here, we also were provided with another report from a popular YouTuber – we don't doubt the issue exists. I hear that Xeal Pharma have gone through 4 different retention samples (40g) and inspected under the microscope with no issues found whatsoever.
I feel that makes sense statistically, we've seen 5 reports across several thousand pots distributed. The odds of them finding issue within 40g would be quite low based on the volume of complaints we've seen overall. Moreover, if the issue was noticeable with the retention samples, it would have been caught earlier overall when they were first packaged and stored.
There are predatory insects used in the cultivator's facility, there's absolutely no reason to doubt reports. Infact, we've had feedback from two different Canadians now, one an ex-employee at Qwest, another working in the Canadian industry; explaining through how they previously had issues in the facility, and several staff went on training courses on pest management via beneficial insects.
Speaking from a regulatory perspective, there's actually a 2% overall limit for foreign matter - meaning 0.2g of 10g could be insects and it would still pass compliance. It's not what patients want, but at least there's a somewhat reasonable reason for how this managed to occur.
We're still wearing a public warning on the main database, though a new batch has since landed and all previous batch pots have now been distributed.
What we're most interested in seeing now is if anyone else receives bugs under the new batch number(s).
I'm just glad others took my post seriously & actually checked theres. Whoever is running the MedBudYouTube channel actually insinuated in a comment that I took bugs from my garden & placed them on the buds & my report wasn't taken seriously until "trusted patients" also reported the issue, not professional at all
I'm just glad others took my post seriously & actually checked theres. Whoever is running the MedBudYouTube channel actually insinuated in a comment that I took bugs from my garden & placed them on the buds & my report wasn't taken seriously until "trusted patients" also reported the issue, not professional at all
Just an observation the MedBud I regularly see posting on YouTube is not MedBud.wiki but it appears just someone who posts on YouTube that has chose that name .
Also I know that the MedBud I know would not insinuate such a thing in such a way, so I would say It's another ID my friend .
Welcome to the forum @DAG4 , had one or two doubt me in certain places on this issue but all said and done when your right your right .
Cheers for raising awareness on this as now at least this issue may be getting addressed.
Just an observation the MedBud I regularly see posting on YouTube is not MedBud.wiki but it appears just someone who posts on YouTube that has chose that name .
Also I know that the MedBud I know would not insinuate such a thing in such a way, so I would say It's another ID my friend .
Welcome to the forum @DAG4 , had one or two doubt me in certain places on this issue but all said and done when your right your right .
Cheers for raising awareness on this as now at least this issue may be getting addressed.
Thank you for the kind welcome it's much appreciated At first I expected that maybe it was a fake account too, however it does seem to be genuine as the channel is linked in the footer of the site, just strange comments to make really but it is what it is.
Thanks to yourself & the other patients also because it probably would've just been been completely dismissed hadn't anybody thats "trusted" checked & reported their findings!
At first I expected that maybe it was a fake account too, however it does seem to be genuine as the channel is linked in the footer of the site, just strange comments to make really but it is what it is. 
